REBUTTAL BY
These are not the best of times for the fake reality show called "The British Monarchy." It seems all that's left now is for the venerable old Queen Elizabeth to finally "kick the bucket" before the Windsor Family's run of popularity totally crashes and burns. And good riddance too!
It's not often that "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times finds itself in agreement with a British Fabian Marxist, er, "progressive" scum such as Hamilton Nolan -- the author of this piece; but this excerpt sums up our sentiments:
"A just and proper response to what we have learned would be for the entire United Kingdom to come together, join hands in a great circle around the institution of the monarchy and burn it to the ground. Then the members of the royal family can sweep up the ashes and deposit them neatly in the bin, a ceremonial beginning to a new life of working for a living.
The existence of a monarchy is an admission that a government can’t, or doesn’t care to, solve people’s problems. Instead, it offers spectacle. It has always been easier to elevate one family to a fairy-tale life of luxury than to do the dreary work of elevating every single family to a decent standard of living. The common people fund the lifestyle of a tiny, exalted and thoroughly unworthy elite, rather than the other way around."
*
Yeah. That sounds about right -- though Nolan's motives for hating the Windsors come from a far different perspective than ours.
It's not often that "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times finds itself in agreement with a British Fabian Marxist, er, "progressive" scum such as Hamilton Nolan -- the author of this piece; but this excerpt sums up our sentiments:
"A just and proper response to what we have learned would be for the entire United Kingdom to come together, join hands in a great circle around the institution of the monarchy and burn it to the ground. Then the members of the royal family can sweep up the ashes and deposit them neatly in the bin, a ceremonial beginning to a new life of working for a living.
The existence of a monarchy is an admission that a government can’t, or doesn’t care to, solve people’s problems. Instead, it offers spectacle. It has always been easier to elevate one family to a fairy-tale life of luxury than to do the dreary work of elevating every single family to a decent standard of living. The common people fund the lifestyle of a tiny, exalted and thoroughly unworthy elite, rather than the other way around."
*
Yeah. That sounds about right -- though Nolan's motives for hating the Windsors come from a far different perspective than ours.
|
|
Today's "nobles" -- a bunch of lazy, selfish, gutless, Globalist worthless eaters and perverts who provide spectacle and circus for the "has been" subjects of dying un-jolly old England.
There was a time when the word "nobility" actually meant something. The French term "noblesse oblige" (literally “nobility obliges”) meant that royalty / nobility extends beyond mere titles and privileges -- requiring the monarch and the "blue bloods" to fulfill social responsibilities. Even in serfdom days, when those who lived on the nobles' land had obligations to the "lord," the Nobleman in turn had obligations to the people's welfare -- including, most of all, protection. And the Lord's cut of the crops was a far lower percentage than what we-the-tyrannized pay in direct and indirect taxes today.
Examples of truly "noble" (protective) attitudes and measures would include:
* England's King Edward I expelling the Jews in 1290
* Hungary's King Louis I expelling the Jews in 1360
* France's King Charles VI expelling the Jews in 1394
* Spain's King Ferdinand & Queen Isabella expelling the Jews in 1492
* Portugal's King Manuel I expelling the Jews in 1496
* Austria's Queen Maria Theresa expelling the Jews from Bohemia in 1744
* Russia's Tzarina (Queen) Catherine the Great banishing Jews to western territories in 1791
Hmmm. There seems to be a pattern here.
Editor's Note: The corruption of England can be traced to Oliver Cromwell's Jewish-funded Civil War and regicide of the mid 1600s. As a result of which, the Jewish moneymen were allowed to return to England after nearly four centuries of banishment, and again set up their banking enterprises.
The aforementioned "anti-Semitic" decrees (just to list a few) were all issued in protective response to the usual suspects committing the usual dirty deeds --- you know, stuff like coin clipping, well poisoning, ritual sacrifice of a kidnapped Christian child and, of course, the most common "canard" ™ of them all -- usurious & ruinous money lending. Notwithstanding the shortfalls of a system of hereditary monarchy, the Christian monarchs of days-gone-by generally had the best interests of their subjects at heart.
So, whatever happened to "noblesse oblige?"
PROTECTING THEIR SUBJECTS FROM USURY AND OTHER "CANARDS"
|
|
|
|
1. King Edward I of England // 2. King Louis I of Hungary // 3. King Charles VI of France // 4. Ferdinand & Isabella of Spain
|
|
1. Catherine the Great of Russia // 2. King Manuel of Portugal // 3. Maria Theresa of Austria
During the tumultuous century following the formation of the Adam Weishaupt's (cough cough) Illuminati (New World Order secret society) in 1776, the nobility of just about every country in Europe sustained a relentless bloodbath of assassinations and "close call" assassination attempts at the hands of Red radicals and deluded "nationalists" carrying out the policy of "propaganda of the deed" -- in which a suicidal assassin would gain eternal notoriety by sacrificing his own life ("taking one for the team") by publicly murdering an Emperor, King, Queen or Prince (Presidents & Prime Ministers too). There was absolutely no one that Rothschild's Reds couldn't get to, or at least get close enough to scare. Even England's Queen Victoria had eight attempts made against her (here).
In due time, personal fear of death and revolution -- combined with the golden carrot of favorable Rothschild finance and flattering Jewish press (a mighty weapon which "the goyim" carelessly allowed to slip from their hands) -- led to the "democratic" ™ domestication of much of Europe. This was then followed by the "if-ya-can't-beat-em-join-em" corruption of the surviving monarchies -- England in particular.
This bit of undeniable history is also boastfully summarized in the turn-of-the-century "hoax" known as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. From Protocol 1: Point 26
"This helped us to our triumph: it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card – the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the Goyim -- that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us.
On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the Goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force."
*
And so, after having terrorized, neutered and Judaized the British and European Monarchies for so long, "noblesse oblige" is about to become "nobles obliterated" as (((they))) will gleefully flush the rotten royal remnants down the toilet bowl of history.
THE PROTOCOLS IN ACTION
PROPAGANDA OF THE DEED
PROPAGANDA OF THE DEED
|
|
|
1. Tsar Alexander II of Russia -- legs blown off by a bomb thrower in 1881 // 2. Empress Elizabeth of Austria -- stabbed in the heart in 1898 // 3. King Umberto of Italy -- shot dead from close range in 1900
|
|
Eight attempts of Britain's Queen Victoria reminded her who the real boss of England was.
|
|
Boobus Americanus 1: I read an op-ed in today's New York Times calling for an end to the British monarchy.
Boobus Americanus 2: The monarchy isn't what it used to be.
St. Sugar: Read The Protocolss! And bring back Edward I!
Editor: "I would thou couldst" ... (a bit of Shakespeare there)
DONATIONS
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKs & PDFs
Boobus Americanus 2: The monarchy isn't what it used to be.
St. Sugar: Read The Protocolss! And bring back Edward I!
Editor: "I would thou couldst" ... (a bit of Shakespeare there)
DONATIONS
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKs & PDFs
*************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
* Allow a few daytime hours (USA EST time) to receive the pdf links.
CLICK IMAGE BELOW & 'SIGN UP' SECURELY
* Be sure to enter e-mail there when prompted.
* Be sure to enter e-mail there when prompted.
*****
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
