*
JUNE 21, 2021
NY Times: No, There is No evidence That the F.B.I. Organized the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot.
NY Times: No, There is No evidence That the F.B.I. Organized the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot.
REBUTTAL BY
Slippery liars and criminals have certain verbal tactics and terms they will always utilize when they come under suspicion or accusation. One, of course, is to label the accuser a "conspiracy theorist ™." Another is to proclaim, as the headline for this Slimes article does, that "there is no evidence. ™" This claim -- which, technically, is often accurate --will generally suffice to divert the simple-minded, attention-deficit-disordered subjects of the overlapping kingdoms of Libtardia & Normiedom from looking too closely at the allegation in question.
The illusionist's literary trick in such cases involves the deliberately crafted confusion between the early "Burden of Proof" stages of "reasonable suspicion" & "probable cause," and the "evidence" needed to establish something at the "beyond a reasonable doubt" level.
You see, the former stages mark the beginning of the criminal investigation process, and the latter, the end. As a metaphor, if one detects a strange sound emanating from his car -- that's "probable cause." The prudent and rational course of action at that point is to have a mechanic run a thorough diagnostic test -- that would (or would not) yield the "evidence" needed to make a definitive determination. But according to the dishonest anti-logic of Fake News, because there is no manifest absolute evidence of a serious engine problem, one should therefore ignore the disturbing sound and just keep on driving.
Naturally, when the search for the necessary hard evidence commences (such as the ballot audit in Arizona) -- all agents of the Judenpresse start to scream the house down!
The illusionist's literary trick in such cases involves the deliberately crafted confusion between the early "Burden of Proof" stages of "reasonable suspicion" & "probable cause," and the "evidence" needed to establish something at the "beyond a reasonable doubt" level.
You see, the former stages mark the beginning of the criminal investigation process, and the latter, the end. As a metaphor, if one detects a strange sound emanating from his car -- that's "probable cause." The prudent and rational course of action at that point is to have a mechanic run a thorough diagnostic test -- that would (or would not) yield the "evidence" needed to make a definitive determination. But according to the dishonest anti-logic of Fake News, because there is no manifest absolute evidence of a serious engine problem, one should therefore ignore the disturbing sound and just keep on driving.
Naturally, when the search for the necessary hard evidence commences (such as the ballot audit in Arizona) -- all agents of the Judenpresse start to scream the house down!
|
|
Fake News says "no evidence" -- but the "Burden of Proof" Pyramid starts with "reasonable suspicion" -- not conclusive "evidence" or even "preponderance."
With the suspicions about the false flag "insurrection" of January 6th ™ now becoming somewhat "mainstreamed," the Slimes is in "debunk" ™ mode. Let's hop into Sulzberger's cesspool and debunk some of their debunking, shall we?
********************
Slimes: Influential conservative voices have spread an unfounded theory that the F.B.I. organized the Jan. 6 siege on the Capitol.
Rebuttal: The term "unfounded theory" is sort of redundant. By definition, any theory is "unfounded" until it can be proved or disproved. Again, the issue here is "reasonable suspicion" only, not final confirmation of "the theory." And given the FBI's admitted policy of infiltrating "right wing" groups, the next standard for "probable cause" has already been met, or at least very close to it.
Slimes: The Fox News host Tucker Carlson, citing the work of the right-wing website Revolver News, speculated about the government’s involvement on his show.
Rebuttal: Carlson "speculated." So, he did not make an actual accusation. What's wrong with that? Isn't it the job of a journalist to ask questions of those in authority?
Slimes: “Strangely, some people who participated in the riot haven’t been charged,” Mr. Carlson said. “Look at the documents. The government calls these people ‘unindicted co-conspirators.’ What does that mean? It means that in potentially every case, they’re F.B.I. operatives.”
Rebuttal: Carlson's choice of words are careful, not reckless. He is merely asking a question, based upon the now confirmed presence of FBI operatives at the January 6th "insurrection," about what may "potentially" be so. (reasonable suspicion / probable cause)
Slimes: The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment...
Rebuttal: Hmmmm. Why not? (more probable cause)
Slimes: But legal experts said ....
Rebuttal: "Legal experts," eh? --- Commie swine with law degrees.
Slimes: ... this speculation was illogical and far-fetched.
Rebuttal: If it is so "far-fetched," then there shouldn't be any fear of an investigation into Carlson's "speculation." Think of how foolish he would look when his theory is "debunked ™." Let's do it!
|
|
|
1. Tucker Carlson is , by far, the nearest commentator on TV to us "conspiracy theorists." // 2. Why did these "Trump supporters" scale and "breach" the walls when they could have simply walked up the Capitol steps like any tourist can? Answer: It was a more dramatic made-for-TV "breaching" shot. // 3. Crazy "Q Anon Man" confronts the fake police.
January 6th was supposed to be the day when the whole country got to hear the evidence of massive voter fraud in various key states. And just as the very first anti-fraud speaker -- Congressman Paul Gosar (R-AZ) was presenting the shocking details of the cheating which took place in Arizona, the "Trump supporters" completed their brazen "breach" ™ of the proceeding and ended the presentation. As the Church Lady of Saturday Night Live fame used to say: "How conveeenient!"
As expected, the journalistic jackals of journalism, the putrid pygmies of politics, and the usual "world leaders" ™ all rushed to condemn the lawless "Trump supporters" and, by logical extension, Trump himself for "inciting" them. Bozo Johnson of the UK called for an end to "the disgraceful scenes in the US Congress." That toothy Communist tranny, Jacinda Adern of New Zealand and Justine Trudeau of Canada also expressed their dismay; as did Scott Morrison of Australia and a gaggle of EU ass-clowns. It was quite a false-flag psyop. The Fake News is now clearly worried that this criminal conspiracy will be investigated -- but we're not so sure it will.
Waiting on Arizona. Stay tuned.
|
|
|
1. Rep. Gosar was bringing some serious rhetorical heat, backed by solid facts, about the election fraud of November past. Suddenly, the "breaching" of Congress by "Trump supporters" brought an abrupt end to the proceedings and changed the subject from fraud to "insurrection." // 2. Frickin' Buffalo Boy! He had to barge into Congress and ruin it for everybody. // 3. Tell it, Church Lady. Tell it.
|
|
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that Tucker Carlson of FOX is promoting a baseless conspiracy theory about the January 6th attack on the Capitol.
Boobus Americanus 2: There is no evidence to support that claim. It's been debunked.
Boobus Americanus 2: There is no evidence to support that claim. It's been debunked.
St. Sugar: Debunk the commie debunkerss -- thatss what I ssay!
Editor: That's what we're here for.
* Share article using Facebook icon -- if it's not below, you can find it at top of page
"TIP THE WRITER"
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS & PDFS
Editor: That's what we're here for.
* Share article using Facebook icon -- if it's not below, you can find it at top of page
"TIP THE WRITER"
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS & PDFS
Post the link for this page to your FaceBook. Simply copy address below ...
realhistorychan.com/anyt-06212021.html
... then click on the F icon and post to your page -- Thanks.
realhistorychan.com/anyt-06212021.html
... then click on the F icon and post to your page -- Thanks.
*************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
* Allow a few daytime hours (USA EST time) to receive the pdf links.
CLICK IMAGE BELOW & 'SIGN UP' SECURELY
* Be sure to enter e-mail there when prompted.
* Be sure to enter e-mail there when prompted.
*****
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
