Capt. Jawana McFadden said that wearing her hair in a bun pushed her helmet forward over her eyes.
FEBRUARY 26, 2021
NY Times: In a Changing Military, the Army Eases Its Rules for Women’s Hair
The Army has issued new regulations that allow women to wear lipstick and no longer limits their hair to a tight bun.
NY Times: In a Changing Military, the Army Eases Its Rules for Women’s Hair
The Army has issued new regulations that allow women to wear lipstick and no longer limits their hair to a tight bun.
REBUTTAL BY
We learn in this story that the U.S. Army -- which not too long ago was an essentially all-male force (with women serving in a few administrative roles) -- is now 15% female. To accommodate the rapidly expanding feminization, the physical standards were lowered years ago. Now the ferocious femmes -- and presumably the trannies too -- will be able to loosen up their hair from the tight bun requirements and even grow it long enough to wear pony tails. They can wear lipstick now as well.
Apart from the fact that in a sane and healthy society, women do not belong in the Army (certainly not in any combat capacity) at all, these new concessions place the safety of both the women and the men in a combat unit at greater risk. One of the reasons for tight hair requirements was to reduce the chances of disease-bearing head lice spreading among closely quartered soldiers. Furthermore, short / tight hair prevents the enemy from grabbing a soldier's hair and slitting his throat during hand-to-hand combat. This ain't no beauty pageant "ladies!"
Apart from the fact that in a sane and healthy society, women do not belong in the Army (certainly not in any combat capacity) at all, these new concessions place the safety of both the women and the men in a combat unit at greater risk. One of the reasons for tight hair requirements was to reduce the chances of disease-bearing head lice spreading among closely quartered soldiers. Furthermore, short / tight hair prevents the enemy from grabbing a soldier's hair and slitting his throat during hand-to-hand combat. This ain't no beauty pageant "ladies!"
|
|
|
The rotten fruit of cultural Marxism -- 15% and rising!
For as long as the U.S. military can sit idle during peacetime, or just blow-up inferior enemies from far away with superior toys, the Army can get away with this twisted "Frankfurt School" cultural Marxism. But should the Globalists succeed in plunging this planet into a prolonged major war against formidable adversaries, there will be a heavy price to pay for allowing these unstable banshees in combat.
First of all, women -- contrary to Hollyweird and comic book portrayals -- are physically and emotionally incapable of handling mortal combat (and thank God that they are!) Secondly, the inevitable male-female attraction dynamic erodes unit cohesion and fundamentally alters that esprit de corps (a $5 frenchified term for a feeling of fellowship and common loyalty shared by the members of a team) that is so essential to shaping a fighting "band of brothers." If you've ever played on a sports team, you'll understand. And thirdly, to the extent that an endangered woman triggers the natural protective male impulse, the males in the unit are likely to be distracted by their impulse to protect the women in their units rather than focusing on the enemy. During combat, a warrior must be able to coldly accept his comrades falling all around him and carry on. Not so easy when a gal you think of as your "sister" (or lover?) is at risk.
This is all so abnormal -- but abnormal is "the new normal ™," I suppose.
|
|
|
How's that "liberation" workin' out for ya, eh tough guy?
We close today's rebuttal with the wise words, delivered in a 1934 speech, by one of our favorite philosophers and defenders of womanhood:
***
" I do not want a uniformed female police officer to walk around and run after scamps or criminals. These are things we naturally don't want. Then they say, 'Excuse me, you don't allow women in the parliament as well.' Certainly, but only because I am satisfied that the parliament does not raise the value of women, but it would only degrade her. I also removed the men from parliament because they were all rotten. (Reichstag laughter)
Then they say, "Why not put some good women into parliament." Because they would turn rotten too. (more laughter)
A women's regiment of snipers is being trained in the Soviet Union... grenadiers in Spain (pre-Franco). All I can say about this type of female equality -- I have experienced war. I know how hard it is. I know how many men’s nerves have been shattered by war. I have often seen them return by the dozens, doddering, completely ruined and broken. The idea that a girl or woman should take this upon herself --- I could have no respect for German men then.
As long as we have a healthy male gender in Germany, no female sharpshooters or grenadiers will be trained in Germany. That is no equality, but rather, inferior rights for women because it is much harder for her than men. We won’t do it – because for us, the woman has been the most faithful work and life companion of the man at all times."
***
Tell it, Great One. Tell it! (that's Hitler for you newbies & normies)
|
|
|
Hitler: "The catchword 'Women’s Liberation' is merely a phrase invented by the Jewish intellect, and its contents are marked by the same spirit. The German woman will never need to emancipate herself in an age supportive of German life. She possessed what Nature gave her automatically as an asset to maintain and preserve; just as the man, in such an age, never had to fear that he would be ousted from his position in respect to woman."
|
|
Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times that the Army is going to allow women to have longer hair without buns.
Boobus Americanus 2: A woman has the right to do whatever she wants with her own body.
*
St. Sugar: A woman'ss place is at home, not the battlefield!
Editor: By buying into "women's lib," Boobus has condemned his own daughter to a joyless life of alienated work slavery.
DONATIONS
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS
Boobus Americanus 2: A woman has the right to do whatever she wants with her own body.
*
St. Sugar: A woman'ss place is at home, not the battlefield!
Editor: By buying into "women's lib," Boobus has condemned his own daughter to a joyless life of alienated work slavery.
DONATIONS
MIKE'S BANNED BOOKS
*************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
AUTO-MONTHLY DONOR / SUBSCRIBER ($5 monthly min.) OR 1-TIME OPTIONS
YOU GET ALL 24 PDF BOOKS
PLUS the "almost-daily' Anti-NY Times
**************
* Allow a few daytime hours (USA EST time) to receive the pdf links.
CLICK IMAGE BELOW & 'SIGN UP' SECURELY
* Be sure to enter e-mail there when prompted.
* Be sure to enter e-mail there when prompted.
*****
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
For 1-Time Online Donation Option, go to DONATE PAGE
To send a check / MO or cash by mail: Payable to:
PASCAL PUBLICATIONS, P.O. BOX 804, SADDLE BROOK, NJ 07663
